DMH Stallard Employment eBulletin January

DMH Stallard Employment eBulletin
Visit Home Page
DMH Stallard Employment eBulletin
In this issue:
Supreme Court restricts claims for common law damages arising out of breach of a contractual disciplinary procedure
TUPE and Companies in Administration
Change of client prevented transfer from being a service provision change under TUPE
Compensation for unfair dismissal should be "grossed up" before statutory cap is applied

Blair Adams

Blair Adams
Partner
Tel 020 7822 1580
blair.adams@dmhstallard.com

Welcome to January's edition of the DMH Stallard Employment eBulletin.

This month we profile a recent ruling by the Supreme Court that restricts claims for common law damages arising out of a breach of contractual disciplinary procedures. In other notable cases, we look at whether TUPE applies to companies in administration.

If you have any questions arising from the articles in this eBulletin then please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Blair Adams
Partner

Meet the rest of the Employment Group
To register for further newsletters and DMH Stallard updates please click here

Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital Foundation Trust; Botham v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58

read more

Key2Law (Surrey) LLP v De'Antiquis [2011] EWCA Civ 1567

read more

Hunter v McCarrick (UKEAT/0617/11); Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust v Hamshaw and others (UKEAT/0037/11)

read more

Hardie Grant London Ltd v J Aspden [2011] (UKEAT/0242/11/0311)

read more