Employment Law ebulletin 2008

DMH Stallard  
Employment ebulletin July 2008 31 July 2008

Martin Williams

Martin Williams
Associate
01293 605072

 

 

 

 

 

This Employment Law ebulletin provides some important updates on prospective legislation.

The Government have released details of the Equality Bill and there are also some long awaited proposals with regard to the status of agency workers. 

A significant case in the House of Lords has addressed the issue of comparators in disability related discrimination cases.

Comparators are also a hot topic in equal pay claims and a recent case has found that a successor cannot be used as a comparator.

Although redundancies are hitting the headlines at the moment when consulting about redundancies an employer should look at ways of avoiding dismissal. If there is suitable alternative employment available then a refusal by an employee to take up the offer ordinarily means that they are not entitled to a redundancy payment. The case of Commission for Healthcare Audit & Inspection v Ward demonstrates that at the margins a balancing exercise is required to decide if this will always be the case.

Consultation akin to redundancy consultation is required when dismissing and re-engaging in order to force through a change in terms and conditions, however, Martland and others v Co-operative Insurance Society found that such dismissals are on the grounds of “some other substantial reason” and not by reason of redundancy.

If you have any queries about the content or format of the ebulletin please do not hesitate to contact me. Alternatively you may wish to contact one of the Partners in the Employment Department listed below.

Yours sincerely
Martin Williams
Associate
Employment Group
DMH Stallard
Tel (01293) 605072
martin.williams@dmhstallard.com

 Rustom Tata  rustom.tata@dmhstallard.com (01293) 605068
 Simon Bellm  simon.bellm@dmhstallard.com (01293) 605066
 Adrian Crawford  adrian.crawford@dmhstallard.com (01293) 605072
 Jenny Thorp  jenny.thorp@dmhstallard.com (01293) 605066

Meet the rest of the Employment team.

To register for further newsletters and DMH Stallard updates please click here

In this issue
Index New Equality Bill
Index Proposals for Agency Workers' Rights
Index Major change in law on comparators for disability related discrimination
Index A successor cannot be used as a comparator in equal pay claims
Index Balanced assessment of suitable alternative employment required when deciding if a redundancy payment is due
Index Re-engagement dismissals are for some other substantial reason
Articles
Article New Equality Bill
Details of the new Equality Bill have been published ready for introduction into Parliament in the next session. [Full Story]
Article Proposals for Agency Workers' Rights
The Government, CBI and TUC have made a joint declaration on how fairer treatment for agency workers in the UK should be promoted and agreement on the way forward for agency workers has also been reached at the EU level. [Full Story]
Article Major change in law on comparators for disability related discrimination
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm - There now needs to be a connection between dismissal, or other actions, not just the fact of the existence of disability, before disability discrimination can be established. [Full Story]
Article A successor cannot be used as a comparator in equal pay claims
Walton Centre for Neurology v Bewley - The Employment Appeal Tribunal has found that allowing comparison with a successor involves enough speculation to make it hypothetical and, therefore, not allowed. [Full Story]
Article Balanced assessment of suitable alternative employment required when deciding if a redundancy payment is due
Commission for Healthcare Audit & Inspection v Ward - Where a new job offer is only marginally, rather then plainly, suitable a Tribunal is entitled to carry out a balancing exercise looking at all relevant issues. [Full Story]
Article Re-engagement dismissals are for some other substantial reason
Martland and others v Co-operative Insurance Society - A Tribunal was entitled to find that a job was the same even though terms and conditions had been significantly changed. [Full Story]