Argos UK told no collection point available for unfair advantage of trade mark claim

19 Oct 2018

Argos UK have been told by the Court of Appeal that revenue generated by Google Ads on the website of Argos Systems Inc. does not take unfair advantage of the Argos UK trade mark.

Argos Systems Inc. is a US company selling specialist construction software sold mainly in the Americas and is the owner of the domain name Argos Systems has traded since 1992 and has a reputation as an established provider of bespoke construction software. Argos UK, being the UK high street catalogue giant, brought a claim against Argos Systems alleging that Argos Systems took unfair advantage of the Argos UK trade mark. Argos UK took issue with the domain name owned by Argos Systems and argued that it took unfair advantage of the domain owned by Argos UK:

Argos UK based its claim on the idea that Argos Systems benefits from the trade mark and the reputation that the Argos UK has developed over the years, by generating income through Google Ads. Google Ads pays a website host to place advertisements on its site, generating income based on web traffic and visitor engagement with the advertisements. Argos UK’s stance was that consumers were visiting the Argos Systems website by mistake, actually looking for Argos UK. One mouse click onto the website is enough to boost the site’s traffic and increase the revenue generated by Argos Systems from Google Ads. The revenue obtained by Argos Systems was around $30,000 USD.

The Court of Appeal held that there was no unfair advantage taken of the Argos UK trade mark. Primarily this was because the Argos Systems website made no reference to the Argos UK website or trade mark and, upon visiting the Argos Systems website, it would be obvious to a consumer that they are in the wrong place.

A domain name of a business’ website  is an important piece of intellectual property that will allow consumers to access its website. It will also contribute to the value of a business’ goodwill and often be a primary entry point of trade. It is therefore crucial for businesses trading online that a domain name is protected along with the content and trade marks that appear on the website. Disruption to online trading or dilution of any marks online could lead to loss of customers, revenue and goodwill.   

If you are facing similar issues or need advice on any aspect of intellectual property, we have the expertise to help; please get in touch.

Further reading

Permitted Development Rights and the revised NPPF: Article 4 directions

Blog, Legal Updates
A revised National Planning Policy Framework has just been published. Holly Stevenson focuses on the change to Article 4 Directions
Read more Read

Can commercial lessees now ‘relax’ given the extended Government moratorium on forfeiture for non payment of rent?

Legal Updates
Property Litigation Partner, Keith Pearlman, doesn't think so and explains why they could be in for a nasty shock from 1 October of this year
Read more Read

Excluding and limiting liability: How to play your cards right

John Yates considers the art of crafting clauses to reduce risk
Read more Read

Update on the rules concerning the changes to Crown Preference

Blog, Legal Updates
As corporate insolvencies remain low, a clear picture of how the partial reintroduction of Crown Preference is likely to impact on businesses, and on lender practices, has yet to emerge. Oliver Jackson provides an update
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax


    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch