Brexit and IP – how bad could it be?

09 Feb 2018

What happens if no deal is reached about the Post-Brexit IP landscape for pre-existing EU trade marks and registered designs?

If you read my earlier article IP & Brexit: A View From Rights Holders, you will know what a large number of high profile owners of intellectual property would like to see from Brexit.

In short they would like:

  1. EU IP rights, in existence prior to Brexit, to continue to provide protection in the UK, however that may be achieved
  2. Rights holders’ should not have to suffer any significant cost or administrative burden to maintain existing rights.

We wait to see if that can be achieved.  In the meantime, the EUIPO has made clear how bleak the post-Brexit IP landscape could look.  In a new set of FAQs the EUIPO tells us what the default position would be if no deal is reached and if no new provisions are made in the EU or in the UK to deal with the ongoing treatment of pre-existing EU trade marks and registered designs.

In the above scenario, here is what will happen post-Brexit:

  1. EU trade marks will cease to give protection in the UK;
  2. If you hold an EU TM pre-Brexit you will not have the right to convert it in to a UK trade mark;
  3. EU trade mark courts’ measures will no longer have effect in the UK;
  4. UK courts will no longer be able to take measures affecting the EU with regards to validity of EU trade marks;
  5. It will not be possible to convert an EU trade mark into a UK trade mark post-Brexit. This is something which is currently possible under EU law;
  6. If a UK company with an EUTM wishes to maintain its rights, it will eventually not be able to rely on use of the EUTM in UK, it will have to show use in at least one of the remaining 27 EU member states (“EU27”);
  7. English will continue to be one of the languages of the EUIPO. Brexit will not affect this, given that Ireland and Malta each have English as one of their official languages;
  8. If you need to demonstrate that your trade mark has acquired distinctiveness in order to successfully apply for an EUTM, any distinctiveness acquired through use in the UK post-Brexit will not be taken into consideration;
  9. Any earlier rights existing in the UK, such as registered UK trade marks or any unregistered rights, cannot be relied upon in any proceedings against EUTMs. Although there is an exception to this;
  10. Broadly speaking the above points also apply to Community design rights.

Clearly these potential outcomes could not be more different to those which any sensible rights holder would want. They are miles away from where MARQUES want to be.

If nothing else this publication from the EUIPO gives the UK an urgent reminder (I am sure those who need to know have thought of these points already!) as to the holes which need to be plugged before Brexit takes its full effect. Where it is within our control to do so, the UK will hopefully address these vulnerabilities in its transitional arrangements with the EU27 and implement relevant new UK laws pre-Brexit. Where there are gaps over which the UK will not have control, we rely upon our negotiating team to strike a deal which expressly deals with them. Prior to that it becomes every stakeholder’s responsibility to shout about the IP cover we have to have in place post-Brexit.  

If you have any concerns about ensuring your business is well protected by its IP, please contact:

Further reading

Permitted Development Rights and the revised NPPF: Article 4 directions

Blog, Legal Updates
A revised National Planning Policy Framework has just been published. Holly Stevenson focuses on the change to Article 4 Directions
Read more Read

Can commercial lessees now ‘relax’ given the extended Government moratorium on forfeiture for non payment of rent?

Legal Updates
Property Litigation Partner, Keith Pearlman, doesn't think so and explains why they could be in for a nasty shock from 1 October of this year
Read more Read

Excluding and limiting liability: How to play your cards right

John Yates considers the art of crafting clauses to reduce risk
Read more Read

Update on the rules concerning the changes to Crown Preference

Blog, Legal Updates
As corporate insolvencies remain low, a clear picture of how the partial reintroduction of Crown Preference is likely to impact on businesses, and on lender practices, has yet to emerge. Oliver Jackson provides an update
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax


    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch