Changing the terms of employment following a TUPE transfer

26 Aug 2014

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT0 recently looked at an interesting case, Cetinsoy v London United Busways Limited, involving changes made to working conditions following a TUPE transfer. It looked at when such changes might amount to a constructive dismissal and/or a substantial change in working conditions to the employee’s material detriment under Regulation 4(9) TUPE so as to allow the employee to regard themselves as dismissed.

In this case, as a result of a TUPE transfer, a group of bus drivers were required to change the depot from which they worked.  This involved an increase in the time it took the drivers to travel to work. Two of the drivers resigned at the time of transfer whilst two worked from the new depot for a while and then resigned. Their contracts of employment listed the depots from which they could be required to work and the new depot was not amongst those listed.  It was accepted therefore that the change amounted to a breach of contract but the question was whether that was a fundamental breach (for the purposes of constructive dismissal) or a substantial change to the employee’s material detriment (for the purposes of Regulation 4(9)).

The Employment Tribunal’s conclusion, which was supported by the EAT, was that there was neither a fundamental breach nor a substantial change.

The main basis for that decision was the fact that the list of depots to which the employees could be moved in accordance with their terms of employment included depots which would have been more inconvenient to them than the depot to which they were moved.  The ET also, perhaps surprisingly, noted that an increase of an hour in the time it took to travel to work was not a substantial change in working conditions.

The case is a useful reminder that even if a proposed change is outside the terms of the contract, it will not necessarily amount to a constructive dismissal and/or a substantial change under Regulation 4(9) TUPE.

For more information please contact:

Further reading

Remote working and home security

Blog, News & PR
With a large proportion of the workforce now working from home, security arrangements for home workers need to be addressed - Robert Ganpatsingh explains
Read more Read

Tenants take note: dilapidations damages to be subject to VAT

Blog, Legal Updates
Property expert Cheraine Williams explains why dilapidations could be about to get more expensive
Read more Read

Covid business interruption insurance payments due to small and medium companies

Blog, Legal Updates
Partner Jonathan Compton looks at the Supreme Court’s decision on business interruption insurance
Read more Read

DMH Stallard’s corporate team shortlisted for four awards

Blog, News & PR
Current Corporate Law Firm of the Year hoping to hold on to the title in 2021
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax


    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch