Dismissing an employee who is on a final warning. What should be on your mind?

03 Feb 2014

It’s always worth taking particular care if you are contemplating dismissing an employee who is already on a final warning and who has committed a further act of misconduct. The Court of Appeal recently confirmed that a Tribunal can review the circumstances of the earlier warning when considering the fairness of any subsequent dismissal.

What aspects of any previous warning should you be looking at if you are in this situation?

The starting point is to ask yourself whether you are relying on the final warning. Is the misconduct that you are dealing with so serious that you are entitled to regard it as gross misconduct justifying dismissal on its own? If that is the case, you have no need to consider the final warning.

Alternatively, if the misconduct is of a lower grade such that it would only lead to a dismissal in the event of there being an existing final warning, or if you believe the misconduct to be gross misconduct justifying dismissal but want to keep the safety net of relying also on the final warning, then that warning will be relevant.

You should ensure that the earlier warning clearly spelt out that the consequences of further misconduct might be dismissal.

You should check carefully what the final warning says. Does it state that any further misconduct may lead to a dismissal or does it refer only to “misconduct of a similar nature” or “any repetition”? If it is the latter, make sure that the alleged misconduct is of a nature that does trigger a potential dismissal. Similarly check that the final warning remains current and has not expired.

To what extent should you review the validity of the final warning?

The Court of Appeal have recently provided some useful clues in the case of Adegbola v Marks and Spencer plc when they considered how far a Tribunal should explore the circumstances of the final warning where an employee subsequently commits a further act of misconduct and is dismissed.

They confirmed that a Tribunal may consider the reasonableness of a previous final written warning when assessing the fairness of a dismissal and that, applying previous case law, the Tribunal should be satisfied that the final warning had been given in good faith.

What does that mean for an employer contemplating dismissing an employee who is already on a final written warning?

Certainly, if the employee disputes the validity of the final warning, it would be wise to check back to see that the evidence suggests that it had been given in good faith. The odd procedural hiccup in the process will probably not mean that the warning was given in bad faith. However, is there anything that suggests more serious shortcomings in the warning? Certainly you would be wise to listen to what the employee has to say about the final warning and it would be dangerous to ignore it out of hand on the basis that the time for debating it has passed.

If the employee did not appeal against the final warning at the time it was given, you would be entitled to treat a subsequent complaint with some scepticism. However be on the look out for any information which is being put forward which does suggest bad faith may have been involved.

What if the employee does not volunteer any challenge to the final warning? It is probably safe to proceed without reviewing the final warning. It will be difficult for an employee who raises no complaint at the dismissal stage to later argue that the earlier warning had been given in bad faith.

It’s worth taking these careful steps, not least because in such a situation, the employee may start off with some sympathy at the Tribunal if they have been dismissed because of something that may well fall short of amounting to gross misconduct.

Further reading

Reversal of changes to High Net Worth Individual and Self-certified Sophisticated Investor criteria implemented

Blog, Legal Updates
18/03/2024
As discussed in our recent update, the government announced in the Budget that the eligibility criteria for the exemptions, which allow shares and other financial instruments to be marketed to High Net Worth Individuals and Self-certified Sophisticated Investors without the regulatory protections
Read more Read

FCA to investigate personal guarantees in small business lending following a super complaint

Blog
12/03/2024
The FSB has raised concerns that the demand for personal guarantees by lenders has a detrimental impact on small businesses accessing borrowing to grow
Read more Read

ECCTA: Fundamental changes for companies and considerations for lenders: Practical points to note

Blog
08/03/2024
Tyne Harman outlines some of the key considerations for lenders and borrowers alike to be aware of.
Read more Read

Budget News – reversal of changes to High Net Worth Individual and Self-certified Sophisticated Investor criteria

Blog, News & PR
06/03/2024
In today’s Budget statement, the government indicated that it will legislate to reinstate the previous eligibility criteria to qualify as a high net worth or sophisticated investor, and will also carry out further work to review the scope of the exemptions.
Read more Read
  • Brighton - Jubilee St

    1 Jubilee Street

    Brighton

    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Brighton - Old Steine

    47 Old Steine

    Brighton

    East Sussex

    BN1 1NW

  • Gatwick

    Griffin House

    135 High Street

    Crawley

    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road

    Guildford

    Surrey

    GU3 1LR

  • Hassocks

    32 Keymer Road

    Hassocks

    West Sussex

    BN6 8AL

  • Horsham

    3rd Floor

    Afon Building

    Worthing Road

    Horsham

    West Sussex

    RH12 1TL

  • London

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane

    London

    EC4A 3BF

  • Make an enquiry

    Make an enquiry

    Message

    Or head to our Contact us page