How the Fast Track can work for businesses

18 Oct 2017

We have recently been involved in a case for one of our commercial clients that was allocated to the fast track in a local County Court. It is not a venue in which we, or our clients, often find ourselves, but given the outcome and the costs order it is worth relating the experience.

The fast track is the usual track for modest claims of between £10,000 and £25,000. It is designed to provide a quicker, simpler procedure to the multi-track for lower value cases that do not require detailed preparation and a lengthy trial (even though the procedural steps to be completed are virtually identical). The aim is for fast track cases to be compromised or tried within a period of 30 weeks from the allocation and giving of directions. As litigators know very well, given the relatively low value of claims, costs recovery is likely to be limited once the court has applied the proportionality test. In addition, recoverable trial costs are very limited and when they increase, do so by small increments only. This incentivises the parties to settle such lower value disputes, but can prove to be a difficult balancing exercise for solicitors when their costs to trial can easily become disproportionate to the sums in dispute.

When faced with the claim against our client in this matter, we first had to strike out one part of the case against a defendant who patently should never have been a party in the first place. Having dealt with that initial issue, the client quite sensibly sought to resolve the matter on a pragmatic commercial basis (while complying with a challenging timetable of directions) and several without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC) offers were made. However, the claimant was having none of it and wanted their day in court. They duly got it and the costs incurred exceeded the sums alleged to be in dispute. A full day’s hearing later, the claim was dismissed and our client was awarded costs. Importantly, having been forewarned about recovery of costs in the fast track, our client nevertheless got a costs order reflecting a recovery of some 95% of the costs they incurred.

What we learned from the case was that costs are always in the discretion of the court and, where appropriate, awards will be made that do not necessarily follow the black letter rules of procedure. Although we were not able to quiz the judge on the rationale behind the costs order, we believe that the judge considered that all the preparation for the trial had been necessary and that both we and our client had conducted ourselves properly throughout.

We also believe that one of the persuasive factors was our ability to demonstrate that settlement on generous terms had been attempted on a number of occasions and, as such, our client was forced into the last resort of a trial through no fault of our own. On this occasion, accepting that such outcomes cannot be predicted with certainty, justice was done for our client rather than what may have been a pyrrhic victory.

Whilst it is correct to proceed on the basis that costs recovery in the fast track is likely to be limited, it is not inevitably so. The importance of making genuine WPSATC attempts to settle the matter cannot be underestimated; even if a client is not prepared to gamble with the cost consequences of a Part 36 offer being accepted, there is still some value in making a WPSATC offer and keeping the position on settlement under close review.

Winston Churchill said, ‘to jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war’, but if that is not within your control then there is a prospect that the costs recovery under the fast track will receive some judicial empathy.

Further reading

Commercial landlords face extended restrictions

Blog, Legal Updates
Landlords take another hit as tenants’ protection mandated to last two years; Lawrence Morley takes a look
Read more Read

New Homes Quality Code – consultation under way

Blog, Legal Updates
Now is the time for housing developers to contribute to the discussion about new quality code
Read more Read

Is changing terms of employment about to become more difficult?

Employers beware. It may become more difficult to change terms of employment through the process of dismissal and re-engagement or “fire and rehire”.
Read more Read

Is the menopause really a business issue?

Abigail Maino explores the extent to which employers should be supporting employees who may be struggling with symptoms of the menopause
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax


    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch