Landlords take note – new statutory demand limit to come into force

25 Feb 2016

The financial threshold for creditors serving a statutory demand on a debtor under the Insolvency Act 1986 is due to be increased. From 1 October 2015 a creditor will need to be owed at least £5,000 of undisputed debt (rather than £750 as at present) before a statutory demand can be served. Also, landlords will be well aware that the remedy of distress - whereby a landlord could instruct bailiffs to seize a tenant’s goods as security for rent arrears - was abolished in April 2014. This new change will serve to further reduce landlords’ options when attempting to recover rent arrears from tenants.

The service of a statutory demand on a tenant is a quick and inexpensive method of recovering rent arrears of £750 or more where there is no dispute as to the debt claimed and particularly when the tenant has assets available. The tenant debtor will have 21 days in which to settle the debt before the landlord creditor can bring insolvency proceedings. The threat of insolvency is a significant one and is therefore often a very effective method of persuading a non-paying tenant to settle its debts promptly.

The rationale for the increase in the limit is to prevent the serious consequence of insolvency for what can be relatively minor debts. The result is that landlords will have fewer remedies available for recovery of rent arrears less than £5,000.

The statutory Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery procedure ("CRAR") was introduced in April 2014 in place of the remedy of distress in relation to commercial tenancies. Distress was a relatively quick, low-cost and effective method of recovering arrears. The CRAR procedure is more convoluted and, as a result, is more expensive and time-consuming for landlords.

After 1 October 2015, where there are rent arrears which total less than the proposed statutory limit of £5,000, the methods of recovery available to a landlord will include forfeiture, a money claim through the County Court, CRAR, and, where appropriate, recovery from a guarantor or by drawing down on a rent deposit.

Landlords must carefully consider their options against the specific facts of the case to assess the availability, effectiveness and potential costs involved in pursuing any particular remedy.


Further reading

CMA fines pharmaceutical company more than £100m

Drug pricing policies under scrutiny as CMA comes down hard on inflated prices and supernormal profits
Read more Read

5 data protection changes to be aware of

Commercial law specialist Liz Gillingham provides a summary of recent developments in data protection law
Read more Read

Destination: office?

Blog, News & PR
Emily Wood considers the results of our recent survey and the implications for the future of the post-pandemic workplace
Read more Read

Commercial lease renewals and pandemic clauses

Will commercial reality trump the law when leases are up for renewal? Property expert James Picknell takes a look
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax


    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch