Nike fined €12.5m for merchandise sale practices

12 Apr 2019

Fans of Manchester United, FC Barcelona, Juventus, Inter Milan, AS Roma and the French Football Federation will be interested to hear that Nike had to change how it sells its merchandise to the advantage of consumers.

The sportswear giant was recently fined €12.5m for its cross-border sales practices that affected football merchandise sales between 2004 and 2017. As part of its licencing agreements, Nike blocked merchandise traders from selling products outside their territories and even expressly prohibited firms from suppling customers in other countries within the EEA if such countries were outside agreed territories. Such practices resulted in football fans having less choice over their merchandise and having to put up with higher prices.

The European Commission found that Nike’s practices hindered competition and partitioned the single market contrary to EU law. The Commission’s decision comes as good news to football fans who have a right to shop around in the single market and benefit from choice of merchandise and pricing available in any member state.

EU competition conflict

How did Nike’s branding get into conflict with EU competition law, and is your business at risk of falling foul of cross-border trade requirements?

Besides its own branded sportswear, Nike produces licenced merchandise which features the brands of football clubs. Nike then licenses the IP rights of the merchandise to third parties for manufacturing and distribution. It is the licencing agreements with the third parties that were challenged by the European Commission. The non-exclusive agreements contained provisions that restricted cross-boarder sale within the EEA.

Whilst Nike acts rightfully as the licensor of the IP rights featured on the football merchandise, it cannot contravene EU competition law in its licencing agreements by restricting manufacturing and distribution of the football products in the EEA. Such restrictions are contrary to Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.

The EU Commission is currently still looking into similar licensing and distribution practices of Sanrio and Universal Studios. 

If you are concerned that your business might have controversial provisions in your licencing agreements, or if you have any other questions in regards to IP rights, get in touch with Beatrice Bass.

Further reading

Remote working and home security

Blog, News & PR
With a large proportion of the workforce now working from home, security arrangements for home workers need to be addressed - Robert Ganpatsingh explains
Read more Read

Tenants take note: dilapidations damages to be subject to VAT

Blog, Legal Updates
Property expert Cheraine Williams explains why dilapidations could be about to get more expensive
Read more Read

Covid business interruption insurance payments due to small and medium companies

Blog, Legal Updates
Partner Jonathan Compton looks at the Supreme Court’s decision on business interruption insurance
Read more Read

DMH Stallard’s corporate team shortlisted for four awards

Blog, News & PR
Current Corporate Law Firm of the Year hoping to hold on to the title in 2021
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax


    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch