Nike fined €12.5m for merchandise sale practices

12 Apr 2019

Fans of Manchester United, FC Barcelona, Juventus, Inter Milan, AS Roma and the French Football Federation will be interested to hear that Nike had to change how it sells its merchandise to the advantage of consumers.

The sportswear giant was recently fined €12.5m for its cross-border sales practices that affected football merchandise sales between 2004 and 2017. As part of its licencing agreements, Nike blocked merchandise traders from selling products outside their territories and even expressly prohibited firms from suppling customers in other countries within the EEA if such countries were outside agreed territories. Such practices resulted in football fans having less choice over their merchandise and having to put up with higher prices.

The European Commission found that Nike’s practices hindered competition and partitioned the single market contrary to EU law. The Commission’s decision comes as good news to football fans who have a right to shop around in the single market and benefit from choice of merchandise and pricing available in any member state.

EU competition conflict

How did Nike’s branding get into conflict with EU competition law, and is your business at risk of falling foul of cross-border trade requirements?

Besides its own branded sportswear, Nike produces licenced merchandise which features the brands of football clubs. Nike then licenses the IP rights of the merchandise to third parties for manufacturing and distribution. It is the licencing agreements with the third parties that were challenged by the European Commission. The non-exclusive agreements contained provisions that restricted cross-boarder sale within the EEA.

Whilst Nike acts rightfully as the licensor of the IP rights featured on the football merchandise, it cannot contravene EU competition law in its licencing agreements by restricting manufacturing and distribution of the football products in the EEA. Such restrictions are contrary to Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.

The EU Commission is currently still looking into similar licensing and distribution practices of Sanrio and Universal Studios. 

If you are concerned that your business might have controversial provisions in your licencing agreements, or if you have any other questions in regards to IP rights, get in touch with Beatrice Bass.

Further reading

Use of statutory demand to make company insolvent suspended until June

Blog, Legal Updates
Cheraine Williams looks at more temporary Covid-driven measures that will protect businesses and tenants from possible legal action
Read more Read

New guidance issued for valuation of flats and investigating fire safety

Blog, Legal Updates
Cheraine Williams looks a the current situation facing leaseholders looking to sell or re-finance their property; will new guidance provide clarity?
Read more Read

Government sets new energy targets for domestic and commercial buildings

Blog, Legal Updates
UK law requires net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050; new rules and standards for heating and powering buildings will have a significant impact
Read more Read

Covid regs prevent landlords taking action to recover rent for more than 500 days

Blog, Legal Updates
Just seven days’ rent arrears used to be enough for commercial landlords to take action; the latest adjustment pushes that out to 554 days
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax


    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch