Ofcom delivers record £50m fine for Royal Mail's breach of competition law

15 Aug 2018

The case surrounds actions found to be undertaken by Royal Mail in 2014 when TNT (now known as “Whistl”) was attempting to gain entry into wholesale mail delivery then dominated by Royal Mail. Had it been successful, TNT/ Whistl would have been Royal Mail’s first such competitor.

Ofcom’s inquiry following a complaint by Whistl, alleging that Royal Mail (1) had a dominant - indeed a monopoly position in the relevant market, and (2) had used this position to undermine TNT/Whistl.

In effect, Ofcom's central finding was that price rises in 2014 by Royal Mail forced potential competitors out of where they would have to use Royal Mail infrastructure for delivery. Ofcom's found Royal Mail's price rises to be "anti-competitive discrimination against customers, such as Whistl, who sought to deliver bulk mail".

Jonathan Oxley, Ofcom’s competition group director, stated that Royal Mail breached competition law by abusing its dominant market position. If a company has a large enough part of a relevant market sector then it must behave in such a way as not to prejudice its competitors in an unreasonable way.

Royal Mail expressed its disappointment with Ofcom’s decision and “considers that the decision is without merit and fundamentally flawed."

It is Royal Mail’s case that the 2014 price changes were designed to foster its unique obligation to provide a Universal Service. Unlike other entrants in to the market, Royal Mail must provide a statutory Universal Service which in effect obliges it to provide a same rate/charge service whether the delivery is to Land’s End, Aberdeen or any point inbetween.

Whistl’s initial legal advice suggests that it now has a claim for damages. Their spokesperson has suggested that the claim will need to be quantified.

Royal Mail has indicated it will appeal the penalty.

Please contact Jonathan if you are looking for advice about competition law or any other commercial dispute.

Jonathan’s comments were featured in both The Financial Times and The Daily Telegraph, 15 August 2018.

Further reading

Use of statutory demand to make company insolvent suspended until June

Blog, Legal Updates
08/04/2021
Cheraine Williams looks at more temporary Covid-driven measures that will protect businesses and tenants from possible legal action
Read more Read

New guidance issued for valuation of flats and investigating fire safety

Blog, Legal Updates
07/04/2021
Cheraine Williams looks a the current situation facing leaseholders looking to sell or re-finance their property; will new guidance provide clarity?
Read more Read

Government sets new energy targets for domestic and commercial buildings

Blog, Legal Updates
06/04/2021
UK law requires net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050; new rules and standards for heating and powering buildings will have a significant impact
Read more Read

Covid regs prevent landlords taking action to recover rent for more than 500 days

Blog, Legal Updates
01/04/2021
Just seven days’ rent arrears used to be enough for commercial landlords to take action; the latest adjustment pushes that out to 554 days
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street

    Brighton

    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street

    Crawley

    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road

    Guildford

    Surrey

    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax

    Horsham

    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane

    London

    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch