Option agreement top tips | landlord’s lender’s consent

02 Apr 2019

The second in our series of key points for developers to consider when entering into option agreements looks at the issue of Lender’s Consent. 

In our experience, developers don’t always want to obtain consent from the owner’s lender to the option agreement, the rationale being that obtaining the consent often delays the exchange of an option agreement.  However the risks of not obtaining a lender’s consent to an option agreement include:

  1. The terms of the landowner’s mortgage are likely to prohibit the grant of an option agreement and therefore if a landowner enters into the option agreement without the consent from a lender, they will be in breach of the terms of their mortgage, and consequently a lender can exercise its power of sale. 
  2. If a lender exercises its power of sale and hasn’t consented to the option agreement, they can sell free of the option agreement.  This means that a developer could go to the expense of obtaining planning permission only to find that they can’t buy the site. 
  3. If a lender does not enter into an option agreement where a landowner is only selling part, there is a risk that the lender won’t agree to provide a Discharge of Part and will insist on the entire mortgage being redeemed.  If the purchase price does not exceed the outstanding loan this may mean that the landowner cannot provide a discharge of their charge and the developer cannot register the transfer. While the developer may have a breach of contract claim against the landowner, litigation is always best avoided. Best practice is therefore to get the lender on board before exchange so you know there will be no issues.
  4. If a lender does not enter into an option agreement, a developer cannot require the lender to enter into a s106 agreement (if required).  S106 of TCPA 1990 requires any party with an interest in land to enter into a s106 agreement (which a lender has). Therefore, if a planning agreement is required to obtain planning permission, it would mean that a developer would not be able to obtain their planning permission.   

Our advice? We would always recommend that a lender’s consent to an option agreement is always obtained.

For more information or advice, please contact Isabel Alderton-Sell.

Further reading

Destination: office?

Blog, News & PR
Emily Wood considers the results of our recent survey and the implications for the future of the post-pandemic workplace
Read more Read

Commercial lease renewals and pandemic clauses

Will commercial reality trump the law when leases are up for renewal? Property expert James Picknell takes a look
Read more Read

Permitted Development Rights and the revised NPPF: Article 4 directions

Blog, Legal Updates
A revised National Planning Policy Framework has just been published. Holly Stevenson focuses on the change to Article 4 Directions
Read more Read

Can commercial lessees now ‘relax’ given the extended Government moratorium on forfeiture for non payment of rent?

Legal Updates
Property Litigation Partner, Keith Pearlman, doesn't think so and explains why they could be in for a nasty shock from 1 October of this year
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax


    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch