What is a selection pool in a redundancy process?

10 Dec 2020

Termination on the grounds of redundancy can be unfair if either the termination is not a genuine redundancy or if an unfair procedure has been carried out.

Part of a fair procedure is to consider whether there is a selection pool.  As an example, the employer considers that three positions in the Accounts Department are potentially at risk. If there are five Accounts Assistants from whom the employer is proposing to select three, there is a selection pool of five and the employer needs to consult with all five Assistants over proposed selection criteria.  Once the employer has finalised the selection criteria, the employer should then score each of the five employees and the three lowest scoring Assistants are then at risk of redundancy.  They  then need to be invited to individual consultation meetings.   

On the other hand, if the position that the employer considers to be at risk of redundancy is the one Senior Accounts Manager, there is no selection pool and the employer can proceed straight to an individual consultation.

Who should be in the selection pool?

There are no fixed rules about how the pool should be defined. In one case, the Court decided that it was reasonable for an employer to dismiss a driver who could do the work of a mechanic whilst not including in the pool a mechanic who occasionally did some driving.

Usually, an employer will wish to keep the pool for selection narrow because a wide pool means more employees to consult with, a greater disruption to the business and potential greater loss of morale.  It is a matter of commercial judgement whether the risks of narrowing the pool outweigh the risk and cost of Tribunal claims.

Selection criteria

The redundancy selection criteria should, as far as possible, be both objective and capable of independent verification.  Potentially fair selection criteria include performance, skillsets identified as important and disciplinary records.  Selection on purely subjective grounds is likely to be unfair.  Even if the selection criteria are fair but they are unfairly applied, the dismissal is likely to be unfair.

If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our Employment Team.

Further reading

Commercial landlords face extended restrictions

Blog, Legal Updates
Landlords take another hit as tenants’ protection mandated to last two years; Lawrence Morley takes a look
Read more Read

New Homes Quality Code – consultation under way

Blog, Legal Updates
Now is the time for housing developers to contribute to the discussion about new quality code
Read more Read

Is changing terms of employment about to become more difficult?

Employers beware. It may become more difficult to change terms of employment through the process of dismissal and re-engagement or “fire and rehire”.
Read more Read

Is the menopause really a business issue?

Abigail Maino explores the extent to which employers should be supporting employees who may be struggling with symptoms of the menopause
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax


    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch