Tenancy deposits : Buyer beware

16 Feb 2017

In Baptiste v Barham (2015), a landlord was ordered to pay to the tenant one times the value of the deposit, which had not been protected within the statutory timeframe.

The landlord had purchased the property subject to the tenancy agreement in 2007. The tenant had paid a deposit when the tenancy was first granted in 2004 but the deposit was never protected. When the landlord bought the property, he renewed the tenancy, but also failed to protect the tenancy. A section 21 notice was served and possession proceedings issued, which the landlord then stopped when the tenant raised as a defence the fact that the deposit had not been protected in a government approved scheme as required by the Housing Act 2004.

The tenant pursued a claim for a financial penalty, and the Court accepted that the landlord had acquired the obligation to protect the deposit and therefore ‘inherited’ the liability for failure to protect the deposit when he purchased the property.

The case highlights how important it is that buyers acquiring residential properties subject to tenancy agreements check carefully whether the tenancy deposit rules have been followed. Otherwise they face liability for financial penalties. In ordering the landlord pay one times the value of the deposit to the tenant, the Court recognised that the landlord was not a professional landlord and had not had a flagrant disregard to the rules. However the Court does have the discretion to order up to three times the value of the deposit. Ultimately, whatever sum ordered by the Court, such a claim is going to be a costly and time consuming battle for a landlord. The case is a reminder of the caveat emptor rule - buyer beware. Buyers acquiring property subject to residential tenancies should always take specialist legal advice.

Further reading

What’s the state of Employment Status?

Blog, News & PR
16/04/2021
Rebecca Thornley-Gibson highlights the challenges faced by businesses who struggle to determine employment status and the impact this has on innovative operating models
Read more Read

Employer's question: how to effectively deal with stress related sickness in lockdown

Blog
13/04/2021
There are a variety of contributing factors caused by the pandemic that have seen a rise in stress related claims at work, but how can employers deal with this more effectively?
Read more Read

Use of statutory demand to make company insolvent suspended until June

Blog, Legal Updates
08/04/2021
Cheraine Williams looks at more temporary Covid-driven measures that will protect businesses and tenants from possible legal action
Read more Read

New guidance issued for valuation of flats and investigating fire safety

Blog, Legal Updates
07/04/2021
Cheraine Williams looks a the current situation facing leaseholders looking to sell or re-finance their property; will new guidance provide clarity?
Read more Read
  • Brighton Office

    1 Jubilee Street

    Brighton

    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Gatwick Office

    Griffin House

    135 High Street

    Crawley

    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford Office

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road

    Guildford

    Surrey

    GU3 1LR

  • Horsham Office

    Ridgeland House

    15 Carfax

    Horsham

    West Sussex

    RH12 1DY

  • London Office

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane

    London

    EC4A 3BF

  • Get in touch