A gavel being hit in a courtroom.

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

High Court dismisses claim against Galliard Hotels Ltd and others

The High Court has handed down its judgment yesterday in case of South Bank Hotel Management Company Limited v Galliard Hotels & Ors [2024] EWHC 2484 (Ch), to dismiss the claim following a 3-week trial.

The freehold owner of the Park Plaza County Hall Hotel (SBHMC) claimed that Galliard – who had developed the hotel site in the early 2000s – had improperly retained a long lease over a commercial building adjacent to the hotel that was eventually incorporated into the hotel. The lease was granted to a company called Lodgeshine, part of the Galliard group, in 2008. SBHMC accused various Galliard entities and the co-founder and executive chairman of the Galliard group, Stephen Conway, of deliberately concealing the lease and of acting dishonestly and in breach of trust.

Mr Justice Richards dismissed the claim and found that Mr Conway (and the Galliard companies) had acted honestly and reasonably. The Judge held that the lease to Lodgeshine had been validly executed and rejected all of the allegations of wrongdoing and concealment that had been made by SBHMC. He went on to conclude that many of SBHMC’s  claims were statute barred and none were saved by any of the exceptions in s.21(1)(a) and (b) or s.32(1)(a) and (b) of the Limitation Act 1980. The Judge consequently upheld Lodgeshine’s claim for more than £1.4m in unpaid rent.

Keith Pearlman and Helen Sheerin and the DMH Stallard London Dispute Resolution team acted on behalf of the successful defendants. They instructed Nicholas Trompeter KC, Simon McLoughlin and Isabel Petrie of Selborne Chambers

About the authors


about the author img

Helen Sheerin

Senior Associate

Advises on a range of commercial and personal disputes, with a particular focus on insolvency and contentious probate.
about the author img

Keith Pearlman

Partner

Dispute Resolution expert specialising in all aspects of property litigation, Corporate and individual Insolvency as well professional negligence.

Stay connected, sign up for updates

Stay connected

Recent articles

Insights

Defective advice, deficient security: professional negligence in the lending sector

In this article we highlight the areas from which professional negligence claims most frequently arise, and some key considerations for protecting your position.

02/06/2026

Insights

Aabar v Glencore: Latest development on legal advice privilege and intra-client communication

Legal advice privilege (“LAP”) was understood to protect only confidential communications passing directly between a lawyer and client for the dominant purpose of giving or receiving legal advice.

11/05/2026

Insights

Theft or Conversion? A tale of two tokens

Almost 7 years on from the UK Jurisdiction Task Force’s seminal report on the law of property relating to purely digital assets and 3 years on from the Law Commission’s own 2023 report on the subject.

21/04/2026

Insights

Do limitation periods apply to unfair prejudice petitions?

In the long-awaited case of Zedra, the Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision and confirmed that limitation periods do not apply to unfair prejudice petitions.

27/02/2026

DISCLAIMER:

THIS INFORMATION IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES AND IS NOT INTENDED TO AMOUNT TO LEGAL ADVICE ON WHICH RELIANCE SHOULD BE PLACED. WE, DMH STALLARD LLP, DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY RELIANCE PLACED ON THIS INFORMATION. ANY RELIANCE ON THIS INFORMATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR RISK. The provision of this information does not create a business or professional services relationship. This information is not exhaustive and does not attempt to address every issue relevant to a particular situation. If you require advice on a specific legal issue, please contact a lawyer listed on our website, dmhstallard.com, or send an email to [email protected].