Apartment building and blue sky.

REAL ESTATE

Residential lease extensions – where are we now?

For owners of residential flats, the past few years has been a period of confusion and frustration as the Government has sought to reform the lease extension process, including the way that lease extensions are valued. The subject has received a good deal of press attention and indeed a new piece of legislation – the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (LAFRA) – was enacted in the final parliamentary session before the general election in July.

We are receiving a considerable number of enquiries from flat owners as to the current position and how they should proceed following LAFRA’s enactment. Unfortunately, there are still no easy answers, because although LAFRA “is on the statute book”, it has not been “commenced” and some parts of the Act have been left blank (in particular, pertaining to the valuation method), pending further consultation by Government with stakeholders, including industry experts and landlord and tenancy advocacy groups. A summary of the key changes under LAFRA is set out below. Some of these changes could be introduced immediately, such as granting a 990 year extended lease term or removing the two year ownership rule (indeed since this blog was first published the Government has announced that the two years requirement will be abolished January 2025).

However, changes to the valuation method are likely to take much longer – months if not years – and these are the changes that would be most beneficial to flat owners.  The latest update from the Government in November 2024  is that they will be launching a consultation on this next Summer which means in practice the position is unlikely to be resolved until at least 2026 as further legislation will need to be introduced to deal with this in detail and fix any current flaws in the legislation.

To add to the uncertainty, some large landlords, concerned by possible erosion of substantial elements of value from their portfolios (in particular, by the removal of so called “marriage value”) are set to launch Human Rights challenges – based specifically on Article 1 of Protocol 1 ECHR grounds (“A1P1”) which relates to the protection of property.  It is not at all clear how these challenges would play out, but they may make the Government less inclined to enshrine the parts of LAFRA that would really significantly reduce the cost to flat owners of extending their leases.

Given the prospect of reform, many flat owners had adopted a wait and see approach, pending LAFRA’s introduction. However, LAFRA (thus far) has proved to be something of an anti-climax. The truth is that no one in the industry is currently able to make an assessment as to when, what, or if, the various proposed reforms will come into play. Flat owners are left hanging – wondering whether to keep waiting for new developments, or to take the plunge under the rules as they (still) are.

If you are thinking about extending your lease or if you are a landlord, please feel free to speak to one of our expert real estate lawyers to discuss your options.

For flat owners whose lease terms are approaching the 80 year “marriage value” threshold, or if they are looking to sell or remortgage in the coming year or so, our advice will most likely be to press ahead with a lease extension claim under the current statutory framework.  However, for those with longer terms and who are otherwise in a position to wait and see, there is likely no harm in doing so. If no significant reforms are introduced, or if they are watered down to see off Human Rights based challenges, their position will not have been materially compromised, but if significant reforms are introduced then they stand to benefit in a meaningful way.

 

Criteria The current position The proposed changes
Term of lease 90 years in addition to the current unexpired term 990 years in addition to the current unexpired term
Ground rent Nil/peppercorn Nil/peppercorn
Ownership qualifying period Two years None
Marriage value Payable where less than 80 years left to run on the unexpired lease None will be payable regardless of the length of the unexpired term of the lease
Landlord’s costs The tenant needs to pay the landlord’s reasonable costs of certain aspects of the lease extension process The landlord to bear their own costs
Calculation rates by which the premium is determined Currently determined by valuation surveyors and if in dispute is determined by the First Tier Property Tribunal To be prescribed by statute (LAFRA). Not yet determined
Online Government calculator to determine cost to extend lease None although the LEASE website has one which can be used to give a general estimate of the of premium for a lease extension and is available here New online Government calculator to be introduced

About the authors


about the author img

Cheraine Williams

Partner

Expert in property and construction disputes, in addition to property related insolvency issues and agricultural tenancies.
about the author img

Tina George

Partner

Specialist in managing complex property portfolios and disputes including statutory freehold acquisitions and lease extension claims.
about the author img

Dan Ongley

Partner

Specialist in non-contentious commercial property matters and leasehold enfranchisement, lease extensions, and right to manage claims.
about the author img

Graham Halsall

Partner

Expertise in landlord and tenant disputes, including break notices and rent arrears, and land disputes such as trespassing and boundary disputes.

Stay connected, sign up for updates

Stay connected

Recent articles

Insights

Defective advice, deficient security: professional negligence in the lending sector

In this article we highlight the areas from which professional negligence claims most frequently arise, and some key considerations for protecting your position.

02/06/2026

Insights

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025: mandatory information sheet for tenants

Failure to provide the Information Sheet within the required timeframe is a breach of the landlord's obligations under the Act with significant financial penalties.

31/05/2026

Insights

Statutory compliance in property finance

Lenders and borrowers should both treat current, satisfactory FRAs, EICRs and asbestos surveys as non-negotiable elements of due diligence. Where deficiencies exist, best endeavours should be used to ensure they are resolved before completion.

29/05/2026

Insights

Losing your competitive edge in property development?

From 6 April 2027 the new “Provision of Information (Contractual Control) (Registered Land) Regulations 2026” are being introduced.

13/05/2026

DISCLAIMER:

THIS INFORMATION IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES AND IS NOT INTENDED TO AMOUNT TO LEGAL ADVICE ON WHICH RELIANCE SHOULD BE PLACED. WE, DMH STALLARD LLP, DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY RELIANCE PLACED ON THIS INFORMATION. ANY RELIANCE ON THIS INFORMATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR RISK. The provision of this information does not create a business or professional services relationship. This information is not exhaustive and does not attempt to address every issue relevant to a particular situation. If you require advice on a specific legal issue, please contact a lawyer listed on our website, dmhstallard.com, or send an email to [email protected].