Residential houses.

REAL ESTATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Forthcoming changes to Right to Manage (“RTM”) claims

Most of the news surrounding the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (“LAFRA 2024” ) has centred on the changes to lease extensions and collective enfranchisement claims.  However, changes are also being made to Right to Manage (RTM) claims which are coming into force on 3 March 2025 by way of s49, s50 and s64 and s51-52 of LAFRA 2024 and new regulations relating to the Model Articles for RTM claims.

RTM claims were introduced in 2002 and give leaseholders the ability to take over the management of the building via an RTM company.  However, in doing so, they do not acquire the freehold and there are strict criteria which apply before the right can be exercised.  In addition, the procedure under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 must be followed, and the leaseholders are liable to pay the freeholder’s costs. Often, it is preferable for the leaseholders to pursue a collective enfranchisement claim to purchase the freehold instead.

The forthcoming changes to RTM claims should, in theory, make it easier for leaseholders to exercise their RTM rights.  This is because:

  1.  The permitted non-residential element of the building is increasing from 25% to 50%, thus more buildings should qualify.
  2. The freeholder’s ability to recover their costs from leaseholders is being restrained such that there are limited circumstances in which they can claim their costs, and they cannot pass on non-litigation costs through the service charge to those non-participating leaseholders either – thus freeholders are perhaps less likely to challenge these types of claims.
  3. The Government has introduced the RTM Companies (Model Articles) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 which make amendments to the “Model Articles of Association for RTM Companies” by capping the votes which can be exercised by landlords to 1/3 of the votes exercised by the qualifying tenants. This means that any votes which the landlord has will be diluted, thus limiting their influence on the claim even where they own several flats in the building.
  4. Any applications relating to defaults in the RTM procedure should now be made to the First Tier Property Tribunal and not the High Court or County Court in the first instance.  The Tribunal is generally quicker than the Court and an application should only be made to the High Court if the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction.

Given the above, it remains to be seen whether there will now be an increase in RTM claims pending the Government’s introduction of the other, more controversial, changes being introduced by LAFRA 2024 to collective enfranchisement claims or whether leaseholders will just wait for those to be introduced.  For more information on those changes please see our blog, “Residential Lease Extensions – where are we now?”

If you need help with landlord and tenant issues or have any questions about Right to Manage claims, please contact one of our Real Estate Dispute Resolution solicitors by email or call +44 (0)3333 231580.

About the authors


about the author img

Cheraine Williams

Partner

Expert in property and construction disputes, in addition to property related insolvency issues and agricultural tenancies.

Stay connected, sign up for updates

Stay connected

Recent articles

Insights

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025: mandatory information sheet for tenants

Failure to provide the Information Sheet within the required timeframe is a breach of the landlord's obligations under the Act with significant financial penalties.

31/05/2026

Insights

Commonhold – a second attempt

Commonhold failed the first time, not because the concept was flawed, but because the implementation was inadequate. Reform could transform flat ownership for millions.

26/05/2026

Insights

Cat B premises – how to value fit out for rating

The valuation of Cat B fit out is a hot issue. Rating Agents, and their clients, will be on the lookout for opportunities where sufficient value is at stake to explore further the issues of law and valuation which are relevant.

18/05/2026

Insights

Real estate nuisance claims: a new era

Nuisance claims have been reshaped, moving beyond traditional disputes over noise or smell to address the complexities of modern land use.

26/01/2026

DISCLAIMER:

THIS INFORMATION IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES AND IS NOT INTENDED TO AMOUNT TO LEGAL ADVICE ON WHICH RELIANCE SHOULD BE PLACED. WE, DMH STALLARD LLP, DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY RELIANCE PLACED ON THIS INFORMATION. ANY RELIANCE ON THIS INFORMATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR RISK. The provision of this information does not create a business or professional services relationship. This information is not exhaustive and does not attempt to address every issue relevant to a particular situation. If you require advice on a specific legal issue, please contact a lawyer listed on our website, dmhstallard.com, or send an email to [email protected].