A person typing on a laptop.

DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND COMMERCIAL LITIGATION

Microsoft and Activision – what is the fuss about?

The Markets and Competition Authority (CMA) is the primary UK consumer protection and market competition regulator. The CMA has this week blocked a planned takeover of Activision. Top of its list of concerns was the CMA duty to promote free market competition in the UK Cloud Gaming market. Microsoft and Activision are very angry.

‘The UK is clearly closed for business’ said a spokesman for Microsoft and Activision.

With respect, both corporations are wrong.

The deal

It’s a big deal. Microsoft was planning to pay $68.7Bn for Activision.

The CMA’s investigation

The CMA announced its investigation in September 2022, published its interim report in February this year and blocked the deal this week.

The facts

The UK cloud gaming market is growing. By 2026 forecasters are forecasting UK sales of £1bn. Microsoft accounts for 60-70% of global cloud gaming. Global gaming is forecasted to reach £11Bn by 2026. Activision owns Call of Duty, Overwatch and Warcraft. Microsoft owns Xbox, and Azure together with Xbox Cloud. So, the deal would combine Activision’s games with Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure.

The arguments

Microsoft made proposals to deal with the concerns of the CMA at the interim report stage. These included making games available on various platforms for a 10-year period. Microsoft further proposed having Activision games available on Game Pass and argued that this outweighed any damage to competition by the merger.

The conclusion

The CMA looked very carefully at the Microsoft arguments. And it dismissed them.

First, the CMA found that Cloud gaming is fast growing in the UK.

Second, that Cloud gaming allowed consumers to play without buying expensive consoles.

Third, that cloud gaming allowed consumers greater choice in when and where they played.

Fourth, that Microsoft dominates cloud gaming.

Fifth, that this deal would strengthen the position of Microsoft in the cloud gaming sector further.

Sixth, that the proposals of Microsoft, though real and substantial, were not sufficient to meet their concerns.

And finally, that Cloud gaming needs a free and competitive market.

The fury

The reaction of both Activision and Microsoft has been one of fury.

“The CMA’s report contradicts the ambitions of the UK to become an attractive country to build technology businesses,”

a spokesperson for Activision said and continued

“The report’s conclusions are a disservice to UK citizens, who face increasingly dire economic prospects. We will reassess our growth plans for the UK. Global innovators large and small will take note that – despite all its rhetoric – the UK is clearly closed for business.”

For more information about any of the issues covered in this update, please contact Dispute Resolution Partner Jonathan Compton.

Stay connected, sign up for updates

Stay connected

Recent articles

Insights

Defective advice, deficient security: professional negligence in the lending sector

In this article we highlight the areas from which professional negligence claims most frequently arise, and some key considerations for protecting your position.

02/06/2026

Insights

Aabar v Glencore: Latest development on legal advice privilege and intra-client communication

Legal advice privilege (“LAP”) was understood to protect only confidential communications passing directly between a lawyer and client for the dominant purpose of giving or receiving legal advice.

11/05/2026

Insights

Theft or Conversion? A tale of two tokens

Almost 7 years on from the UK Jurisdiction Task Force’s seminal report on the law of property relating to purely digital assets and 3 years on from the Law Commission’s own 2023 report on the subject.

21/04/2026

Insights

Do limitation periods apply to unfair prejudice petitions?

In the long-awaited case of Zedra, the Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision and confirmed that limitation periods do not apply to unfair prejudice petitions.

27/02/2026

DISCLAIMER:

THIS INFORMATION IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES AND IS NOT INTENDED TO AMOUNT TO LEGAL ADVICE ON WHICH RELIANCE SHOULD BE PLACED. WE, DMH STALLARD LLP, DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY RELIANCE PLACED ON THIS INFORMATION. ANY RELIANCE ON THIS INFORMATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR RISK. The provision of this information does not create a business or professional services relationship. This information is not exhaustive and does not attempt to address every issue relevant to a particular situation. If you require advice on a specific legal issue, please contact a lawyer listed on our website, dmhstallard.com, or send an email to [email protected].