PLANNING LAW

Why proper title checks matter in planning applications?

The decision of a planning inspector to decline to determine a planning appeal has highlighted the vital importance of carrying out full title investigation and following the correct procedures when submitting planning applications and conducting appeals.

When buying a site for development it is important to carry out a thorough investigation of the title to ensure that you acquire all of the land required to deliver the scheme. If potential problems with the title do arise, for example a strip of unregistered land or uncertainty over the precise boundary, then this can often be resolved by purchasing defective title insurance (DTI).

The need for through title investigation is also vital when applying for planning permission. Whist it is not necessary for an applicant to own all of the land within the development site, gaps in the title can still prevent a lawful planning permission from being granted unless the correct procedures are followed during the application process. These issues cannot be rectified with DTI.

The Requirement for Ownership Certificates

This is because Article 13 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) Order 2015 (the DMPO) makes it a legal requirement for an applicant to give notice of the application to anyone who owns land within the application site. It also requires that where the applicant has taken “reasonable steps” to identify all owners but cannot do so, the applicant must advertise the application by publishing notice in a local newspaper.

Planning applications must be accompanied by certificates, signed by the applicant, confirming that they have complied with the Article 13 notification requirement. Section 65 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 states that a planning application is not valid unless the correct ownership certificate has been completed and the required notices have been served.
Where the relevant certificates are submitted, the Local Planning Authority will usually take them at face value, and will not carry out their own investigation of the title to confirm that the correct notification has been given.

If an error is identified during the application process, for example a third-party landowner comes to light or an objector highlights a title discrepancy, then it can usually be rectified by pausing the application to give the required notifications. This may delay getting planning permission for a few weeks or months.

If there is an error in the notification requirements which goes unspotted and planning permission is granted, then that permission is potentially challengeable on judicial review grounds. This will usually require a challenge to be commenced in the High Court within the 6-week JR period.

However, it may be the case that planning permission is refused by the Council, and it is necessary to appeal that decision to the Secretary of State pursuant to section 78 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (the TCPA). In those circumstances the Article 13 notification requirements apply equally to the appeal.

Consequences of an Incorrect Certificate

In a recent section 78 appeal against Swale Borough Council’s decision to refuse permission for 31 houses on the Isle of Sheppey, it came to light that there were unregistered strips of land within the application site. The relevant notification requirements had not been carried out at the original planning application stage but this was only spotted whilst the appellant and the Council were negotiating the s.106 agreement required as part of the appeal.

Section 79(6) of the TCPA, states that the Secretary of State can decline to determine an appeal if it becomes apparent that planning permission could not lawfully have been granted by the Council.

In the Swale case, the inspector concluded that the failure to carry out the correct notification requirements meant that the original planning application was not valid, and planning permission could not have lawfully been granted. The inspector has discretion to proceed with the appeal, but in that case she declined to do so, meaning that the appeal against the refusal of planning permission failed.

This may be catastrophic for a developer which has invested a considerable amount of time and money in preparing and submitting an application and then having to prepare for an appeal. Particularly where that outcome could have been avoided by carrying out a full and thorough title investigation at the outset and ensuring that the Article 13 requirements had been met.

DMH Stallard’s expert planning lawyers and consultants have the knowledge to help you comply with planning regulations. Contact the team today by email or call +44(0)3333 231580.

About the authors


about the author img

Lee May

Partner

Specialist in S106 agreements, listed buildings, footpaths, highways and compulsory purchase.

Stay connected, sign up for updates

Stay connected

Recent articles

Insights

The 2026 National Planning Policy Framework: a reimagining for national planning

On 17 August 2026, the government published yet another National Planning Policy Framework, only this one is a complete rewrite.

15/10/2026

Events

Property and Planning festive quiz, Brighton 3 December 2026

As we take a festive break from our usual Property and Planning breakfast seminars, join us in Brighton this December for a special festive quiz edition, hosted by our Real Estate and Planning teams.

Events

Property and Planning festive quiz, Gatwick 26 November 2026

As we take a festive break from our usual Property and Planning breakfast seminars, join us in Gatwick this November for a special festive quiz edition, hosted by our Real Estate and Planning teams.

Insights

CIL indexation and outline planning permissions: what developers need to know

For outline planning permissions, CIL indexation is fixed at the date the outline permission is granted. Developers should not accept liability notices that apply a later date.

08/10/2026

DISCLAIMER:

THIS INFORMATION IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES AND IS NOT INTENDED TO AMOUNT TO LEGAL ADVICE ON WHICH RELIANCE SHOULD BE PLACED. WE, DMH STALLARD LLP, DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY RELIANCE PLACED ON THIS INFORMATION. ANY RELIANCE ON THIS INFORMATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR RISK. The provision of this information does not create a business or professional services relationship. This information is not exhaustive and does not attempt to address every issue relevant to a particular situation. If you require advice on a specific legal issue, please contact a lawyer listed on our website, dmhstallard.com, or send an email to [email protected].