Multiple hanging lightbulbs with one illuminated.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The shape of music: the bemusing world of copyright

Copyright is perhaps the most mystifying of the possible intellectual property rights an artist can employ to protect their creations. In a nutshell, copyright protection arises automatically in original works, including music and sound recordings, and generally belongs to the creator(s). However, unlike its companions, design right, trade marks and patent, there is no UK registration process and therefore no ‘black and white’ record as to what is protected and from when (common law protection for brand elements and unregistered design rights also arise automatically, but owners have the option to crystallise their protection formally). Against this background, proving that what you have created is original and has not infringed an earlier work is convoluted; as Ed Sheeran has found out in the recent case against Sami Chokri and Ross O’Donaghue – Sheeran et al v Chokri et al [2022] EWHC 827 (Ch).

In this well-publicised case, Sheeran employed the ‘offence is the best defence’ strategy by bringing proceedings for a declaration of non-infringement of copyright in the 2015 song Oh Why, written by Chokri and O’Donaghue. The duo had notified the Performing Rights Society Limited that they should be credited as songwriters of Sheeran’s hit Shape of You, written on 12 October 2016, claiming that Sheeran and his co-writers had infringed their song Oh Why by copying parts of it in Shape of You.

During the trial, the judge had to apply various tests to determine whether there had been copyright infringement. He considered whether a substantial part of Oh Why had been copied, and if so, had there been conscious copying. The argument centred around the “Oh Why” hook in Chokri’s song and Sheeran’s phrase “Oh I” in Shape of You. For an excellent side-by-side analysis and musical dissection, see David Bennett’s YouTube video from the five minute mark.

Bennett notes that although there is a similar melody combined with a similar lyric, it consists of a “typical climb up the minor pentatonic scale” with a “generic lyric”. The judge concluded the same, finding that the melody was basic, short and commonplace. It was by chance that those two snippets sounded similar, there were enough differences in their placement and in the rest of the two songs, as well as evidence of the creative process, for the judge to conclude that Sheeran had not copied the earlier work and the Shape of You hit had been written organically by Sheeran and his co-songwriters. He also found that Sheeran had not had access to the obscure Oh Why song and had no opportunity to have either deliberately or subconsciously copied it.

Whilst a great case to dissect, it doesn’t really assist those who need clarification the most – the artists. Very few will have Sheeran’s assets to seek a declaration of non-infringement and defend a claim of infringement – both of which will have been costly. How then can they avoid similar allegations?

The honest answer is that there is no easy method. The best advice is to keep records of the writing process. If an author can prove that their work originated first or that the process in no way referred to or included an earlier work, they will have better odds of defending themselves against such allegations.

Digital technology and automatic timestamps of created files helps to create a reliable paper trail. For an old-fashioned method, sealing your manuscript/design in an envelope, sending it to yourself by registered post (don’t open it) and keeping it safe is a tried and tested method of proving the date on which a work is created.

For further advice on how to protect your original works, please get in touch with our intellectual property team and we can discuss with you the best strategy to protect your assets.

About the authors


about the author img

Tim Ashdown

Partner

Expert in trade marks, patents, designs, misuse of confidential information (by employees or competitors), copyright and database rights.

Stay connected, sign up for updates

Stay connected

Recent articles

Insights

Family Investment Companies

Family Investment Companies: what are they, when might they suitable, and how does tax come into play? Our corporate solicitors explain.

04/06/2026

Insights

Defective advice, deficient security: professional negligence in the lending sector

In this article we highlight the areas from which professional negligence claims most frequently arise, and some key considerations for protecting your position.

02/06/2026

Insights

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025: mandatory information sheet for tenants

Failure to provide the Information Sheet within the required timeframe is a breach of the landlord's obligations under the Act with significant financial penalties.

31/05/2026

Insights

Statutory compliance in property finance

Lenders and borrowers should both treat current, satisfactory FRAs, EICRs and asbestos surveys as non-negotiable elements of due diligence. Where deficiencies exist, best endeavours should be used to ensure they are resolved before completion.

29/05/2026

DISCLAIMER:

THIS INFORMATION IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES AND IS NOT INTENDED TO AMOUNT TO LEGAL ADVICE ON WHICH RELIANCE SHOULD BE PLACED. WE, DMH STALLARD LLP, DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY RELIANCE PLACED ON THIS INFORMATION. ANY RELIANCE ON THIS INFORMATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR RISK. The provision of this information does not create a business or professional services relationship. This information is not exhaustive and does not attempt to address every issue relevant to a particular situation. If you require advice on a specific legal issue, please contact a lawyer listed on our website, dmhstallard.com, or send an email to [email protected].