03333 231 580
Contact usClaims against barristers
DMH Stallard’s professional negligence solicitors have experience advising businesses, directors and private individuals on negligent claims against barristers in England and Wales. We focus on clear, practical advice from the outset: whether you have a claim, what it may be worth, and the most effective strategy to pursue recovery.
If you believe a barrister’s advice or advocacy has fallen below an acceptable standard, and you have suffered a financial loss as a result, you may be able to bring a professional negligence claim against a barrister (or chambers). Mistakes at the Bar can have serious consequences: an avoidable adverse judgment, a lost settlement opportunity, wasted legal costs, a missed limitation date, or a commercial dispute that escalates because the risks were not properly identified or explained.
What constitutes professional negligence by a barrister?
Barristers owe a duty to act with reasonable skill and care when providing the work they are instructed to do. The scope of the duty will depend on the terms of the retainer, the instructions provided, and the role the barrister was asked to perform, which might include written advice, drafting, conference work, or courtroom advocacy.
A claim usually arises where a barrister’s conduct falls below what would be expected of a reasonably competent barrister in the same circumstances, and that failure causes measurable loss. Many claims are not about a case being “lost” (litigation is uncertain), but about a missed step, an avoidable procedural failure, or advice that should have been given but was not.
Common examples of negligent barrister work
Professional negligence claims against barristers can arise across many practice areas, including commercial disputes, property litigation, employment, professional discipline, family finance and personal injury. Examples we commonly see include:
- Negligent advice on prospects, strategy or evidence, including failing to identify key issues, defences, or jurisdictional points at an early stage
- Poor or incomplete pleadings (or other drafted documents), such as claims or defences that omit essential allegations, failure to particularise properly, or advance an unsustainable case theory
- Missed deadlines, including limitation-related issues, appeal deadlines, or procedural timetables that lead to strike out or the loss of a valuable claim/defence
- Incorrect advice on settlement, such as failing to advise on realistic valuation, risks, or the consequences of rejecting a settlement opportunity
- Advocacy errors, for example, failing to take a point, failing to adduce or challenge evidence properly, or adopting an unreasonable tactical position that prejudices the client’s case
- Conflicts of interest or failure to advise appropriately where independence is required
- Inadequate advice on costs risk, including the likely exposure if the claim fails and the relevance of costs budgeting or Part 36 strategy
Not every disappointing result will amount to negligence. A successful claim depends on proving that the barrister’s conduct fell below the proper standard and that the failing caused the loss claimed.
Time limits for bringing a claim
Limitation is often critical in professional negligence claims and should be assessed early.
In broad terms:
- A claim in contract must generally be issued within six years from the date of breach
- A claim in negligence (tort) must generally be issued within six years from the date the cause of action accrued
- Where the relevant facts were not known at the time, certain negligence claims may benefit from an alternative time limit of three years from the “starting date” (if later than six years), subject to an overall longstop
- There is also an overriding 15-year longstop for certain negligence claims not involving personal injuries
Limitation is fact-sensitive and can involve difficult questions about when loss was suffered and when knowledge arose. Where time is tight, the parties may consider a standstill agreement or issuing proceedings and seeking a stay while pre-action steps are followed, as recognised by the professional negligence pre-action protocol.
The process for making a claim against a barrister
Our lawyers will usually review the key documents, including the instructions, any advice notes, pleadings, skeleton arguments, transcripts (where relevant), and correspondence with solicitors and the client. We will also consider what happened in the underlying matter, what the alleged error was, and how it caused loss.
Where appropriate, our lawyers will advise on whether expert evidence is likely to be needed on breach, causation and/or quantum.
Professional negligence claims against barristers are commonly expected to follow the Pre-Action Protocol for Professional Negligence, which sets out a recognised framework for pre-action conduct, including a preliminary notice, a detailed letter of claim and a period for investigation and response.
The Protocol’s aims include helping parties identify the issues, exchange information and documents, make informed decisions, and try to settle without proceedings. It also states that the courts may impose sanctions for substantial non-compliance.
Many barrister negligence disputes settle without a trial once the issues and losses are clearly set out. The Protocol emphasises that court proceedings should be a last resort and encourages parties to consider ADR, including mediation, where appropriate.
If settlement cannot be achieved, proceedings may be required. Our lawyers can advise on the correct course of action, the evidence required (including expert evidence where necessary), and a proportionate litigation strategy aligned with the value and complexity of the claim.
The aim is usually to recover damages that, so far as money can, put you in the position you would have been in had the barrister provided competent advice or representation.
Depending on the facts, losses may include:
- costs wasted in the underlying litigation
- the value of a lost claim or defence
- adverse costs orders that would likely have been avoided
- loss of a better settlement outcome and
- other consequential losses
Why instruct DMH Stallard to pursue your professional negligence claim?
Claims against barristers require careful analysis of what the barrister was instructed to do, the standards expected in context, and what would likely have happened absent the alleged failing. We focus on building a clear causation narrative and a robust, evidence-led valuation so you can make informed decisions about settlement and the commercial merits of pursuing the claim.
If you believe you may have a professional negligence claim against a barrister, speak to our professional negligence solicitors for clear, confidential advice on your options and next steps.
Our lawyers have offices in London and across the South-east including Gatwick and Crawley, Hassocks, Horsham, Brighton and Guildford.
Testimonials
Awards
Meet our lawyers
Get in touch with our Professional Negligence solicitors
Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire. Its purpose is to gather preliminary information about your potential professional negligence claim ahead of an initial assessment by our litigation team and to enable us to undertake a conflict search. All information you provide will be treated as strictly confidential and subject to legal professional privilege. Please note that completing this form does not create a solicitor-client relationship, nor does it constitute formal legal advice. Once we have reviewed your responses, a member of our team will be in touch to discuss the next steps.