EMPLOYMENT LAW

Guidance for employers on interim relief applications

Interim relief is an emergency remedy available to claimants who are dismissed in certain automatic unfair dismissal scenarios. As far as interim relief applications are concerned these usually relate to where a dismissal is connected to Trade Union activities or whistleblowing.

2026 has seen a staggering increase in interim relief applications and some of the applications that have crossed our desks at DMH Stallard recently appear to have been drafted with the use of AI tools. The likelihood of claimants making an application for interim relief is now greater than ever but the chances of a successful application remain slim.

 

Interim relief process

Interim relief has to be applied for within 7 days of an employee’s dismissal. The Employment Tribunal will hold a preliminary hearing to determine the application and that usually takes place within 2-3 weeks after the application has been made.

The test for the granting of an interim relief application puts a high burden of proof on the claimant to show that they will have a ‘pretty good chance’ at succeeding in their dismissal claim. If a claimant does show this, they are entitled to the remedy of reinstatement or re-engagement or, where these remedies are impossible or refused by the respondent, the continuation of the claimant’s contract, with pay, until the final hearing.

This is an onerous sanction for employers, particularly in the context of the Tribunal’s back log of cases. It can take up to two years for a final hearing to take place, particularly in complicated matters (such as Trade Union activity or whistleblowing claims ), and paying a former employee their full salary for this period will be incredibly costly.

 

Presidential Guidance on interim relief applications

The increase in interim relief applications has led to the President of the Employment Tribunals issuing Presidential Guidance on applications for interim relief (The Guidance)

The Guidance reveals that the Employment Tribunal previously received about 20 interim relief applications a year, but this has increased to 20 per month. Many of these applications do not succeed but this is not reflected in the number of applications now being made.

The increase in AI use by claimants has been recognised by the Guidance which provides a salutary warning as follows: “Litigants who use AI to assist them have a responsibility to ensure that what is submitted is concise, relevant and accurate.”

 

What are the biggest challenges for employers and how can they mitigate their risks?

Employers unfortunately cannot avoid an interim relief application following certain dismissals. However, diligently following proper procedures, and maintaining thorough and organised records, will greatly assist the defence of an interim relief application.

The main question a tribunal must ask itself, and answer, when determining an application is what was the principal reason for the claimant’s dismissal. The key document before the tribunal will therefore be the dismissal letter. Long gone are the days of the one line dismissal letter: employers will need to take great care when drafting the dismissal letter to ensure it accurately captures, coherently and comprehensively, the genuine reason why the employee was dismissed, with full and particular reference to any relevant evidence uncovered during the investigation prior and leading to the dismissal.

Where allegations of misconduct relate to the way an employee has conducted themselves whilst making, or purporting to make, a whistleblowing  disclosure. the dismissal letter itself should ensure that it demonstrates that the employee’s conduct is clearly separable from the whistleblowing itself.

Where an employee has made, or has purported to have made, a protected disclosure, it will be important for employers to investigate this in accordance with their whistleblowing policy. Any conduct investigation should be in accordance with the employer’s disciplinary policy. This will enable the employer to demonstrate clear and separable investigations in the whistleblowing itself and the alleged employee conduct in how the protected disclosures were made.

 

Preparation is key – Getting your evidence in order

Clear and fully documented paper trails of investigations will be required  in the event of an interim relief application. Whilst the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure and Guidance state that oral witness evidence will not be required unless it directs otherwise we would recommend preparing a witness statement to identify relevant documents and explain the narrative of the dismissal.

Interim relief applications put a heavy burden on employers to gather and prepare documentary evidence connected to the application, to respond to the application, and prepare for the hearing  in a very short timescale. Ensuring the documentary evidence is comprehensive, clear, and easily locatable, will help to significantly reduce this burden.

 

Key takeaway for employers

If you receive an interim relief application, it is important to act quickly in gathering evidence, responding to the application, and ensuring that any relevant evidence can be put coherently before the tribunal in  a matter of days. DMH Stallard’s employment solicitors have significant experience in dealing with these applications in a very short timeframe and supporting employers to navigate their response, preparation and attendance at the interim relief hearing.

For more information please get in touch with our team via our online enquiry form. 

About the authors


about the author img

Rebecca Thornley-Gibson

Partner

Specialist in contract and policy frameworks, employee relations, employment tribunal litigation and senior executive terms and exits.
about the author img

Lydia Goodman

Solicitor

Supports the Employment Law team to advise on a wide range of employment law matters and to prepare for employment tribunals.

Stay connected, sign up for updates

Stay connected

Recent articles

Media spotlight

Train drivers consider potential strike action over lack of access to toilets

Greg Burgess shares his insights with HR magazine on why dignity at work is not optional, and that HR teams should ensure that their organisations are conducting regular facilities and welfare audits.

29/07/2026

Podcasts

Employees working abroad – what do employers need to know?

With overseas working becoming more common, employers need to be aware of the legal and practical issues and the potential consequences of getting it wrong.

28/07/2026

Events

Employment Rights Reforms: What has changed and what can we expect next? 9 September 2026

Join our online workshop where our employment law experts will provide a practical update on the reforms already in force,  what changes are on the horizon, and discuss what employers and HR teams should be doing to plan ahead.

Events

Employment Club, Brighton 17 September 2026

Join the Club! Enjoy a pastry and a hot drink, network with industry professionals, and hear from our team on all things Employment in our Brighton office.

DISCLAIMER:

THIS INFORMATION IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES AND IS NOT INTENDED TO AMOUNT TO LEGAL ADVICE ON WHICH RELIANCE SHOULD BE PLACED. WE, DMH STALLARD LLP, DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY RELIANCE PLACED ON THIS INFORMATION. ANY RELIANCE ON THIS INFORMATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR RISK. The provision of this information does not create a business or professional services relationship. This information is not exhaustive and does not attempt to address every issue relevant to a particular situation. If you require advice on a specific legal issue, please contact a lawyer listed on our website, dmhstallard.com, or send an email to [email protected].