Break options: Some common questions answered

05 Oct 2021

The requirements of enforcing a break in a lease can be difficult to navigate, and which if not followed correctly can result in a missed opportunity to end a business tenancy early; an opportunity which in the current Covid climate, tenants cannot afford to dispense with. The below scenario highlights some of the questions regularly asked regarding break options. 

Q:    I sent an email to my landlord to terminate our lease pursuant to a break clause with weeks to spare. I have asked the landlord to confirm receipt but the landlord has not responded. Is the landlord obliged to?

No. The landlord is not obliged to respond. Furthermore, if the lease states that services of notices by email are not valid, your notice is of no effect.  

Q:    Ok. I have therefore delivered to the landlord’s registered office a written notice which has been signed for, a permitted service by the lease. It has been served a day late. However, it is only a day late and the landlord knew from the previous email notice that the I (as tenant) was going to end the lease and cannot therefore object, can they?

Yes, the landlord can object. Time is of the essence of break clauses and even if your notice is a day late, it is of no effect. 

Q:    The lease specifies that a break notice must be printed on blue paper. I have given notice on ordinary white paper. Surely the landlord cannot object as it is clear what the tenant’s intention is?

Possibly. Sometimes, the courts will help you in circumstances like this, but every case will turn on its facts. Generally speaking the lease requirements must be followed, and if they are not you risk challenge and potential expensive litigation.    

Q:    I have served my break notice in time and validly, which the landlord has accepted. The break date has arrived, I  have vacated, and the shop has been cleared of stock, fixtures and fittings, other than some shop shelving along a wall. The landlord has said that the condition requiring vacant possession to be given has not been complied with. Surely the presence of a couple of shop shelving units cannot prevent me from exiting the lease?

Yes it can, unless the landlord waives compliance with any condition (which it is not obliged to do under normal circumstances).    

Q:    The break date in the lease is 1st December. On the September quarter day, I paid rent from 29th September to 1st December. The Landlord is saying that because the full quarter’s rent has not been paid, the break option has not been validly exercised. Surely this cannot be right, as there are no arrears?

Yes it is right because the lease says it is a condition of the break right that all rents due and payable have to be paid. On this wording the tenant has no room to apportion the rent. 

Q:    The break date is 1st December. I carefully paid the landlord the full quarter’s rent on 29th September. The break date has passed and the landlord has accepted the break has been validly exercised but is refusing to repay the rent from 1st December to 24th December. Surely he must do this as the lease came to an end on 1st December?

No, the landlord is not obliged to refund such apportioned rent. For the landlord to be obliged to do this, the lease must contain a specific obligation to do so.

We can help you with all of the above areas that have been discussed in this Q&A, should the need arise. Please get in touch with your usual contact at DMH Stallard or with Nigel Skevington, Real Estate Partner, by email or by phone on 020 7822 1555.

Further reading

What does fair redundancy consultation mean?

Blog, Legal Updates
All employers will be familiar with the need to follow a fair process of consultation in relation to any redundancy dismissals. But what does that mean? A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision underlined the importance of one aspect of the process
Read more Read

Major Reforms to Companies House

Blog, Legal Updates
The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the “Act”) has now received Royal Assent and become law. Its objective is to deliver a range of reforms to tackle economic crime and improve transparency over corporate entities.
Read more Read

Supreme Court rules that Deliveroo riders are not workers and cannot unionise

Blog, Legal Updates
The Supreme Court brought an end to years of litigation this week and confirmed that Deliveroo riders were not ‘workers’ within the meaning of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA)
Read more Read

Levelling-Up and Regeneration Act 2023: The demise of the four-year rule

A blanket 10 year time limit due to be implemented to take enforcement action on development without planning permission.
Read more Read
  • Brighton - Jubilee St

    1 Jubilee Street


    East Sussex

    BN1 1GE

  • Brighton - Old Steine

    47 Old Steine


    East Sussex

    BN1 1NW

  • Gatwick

    Griffin House

    135 High Street


    West Sussex

    RH10 1DQ

  • Guildford

    Wonersh House

    The Guildway

    Old Portsmouth Road



    GU3 1LR

  • Hassocks

    32 Keymer Road


    West Sussex

    BN6 8AL

  • Horsham

    3rd Floor

    Afon Building

    Worthing Road


    West Sussex

    RH12 1TL

  • London

    6 New Street Square

    New Fetter Lane


    EC4A 3BF

  • Make an enquiry

    Make an enquiry


    Or head to our Contact us page